Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
Temecula, CA
The pilot of the airplane reported that he was conducting a round-trip cross-country flight from his home airport to another airport. The pilot departed his home airport with full fuel tanks (26 gallons of fuel, of which 3.5 gallons were unusable) and he estimated it would have provided about 4.5 hours of flight time for the flight. Upon arrival at the destination airport, the pilot observed both fuel gauges at about 3/4 of a tank, he however, did not visually verify or measure the fuel levels in either tank. The pilot initially stated that his flight time on the outbound leg was approximately 2 hours, 10 minutes. However, he later reported that it was about 1.5 hours. He added that during the return portion of the flight at an altitude of about 8,500 ft mean sea level, the airplane encountered stronger-than-anticipated headwinds, that resulted in a reduced ground speed. He added that he also encountered up and down drafts, which resulted in him adding power and enriching the mixture to maintain altitude and airspeed. As the airplane approached the destination airport, the engine began to lose power and subsequently experienced a total loss of engine power. The pilot reported that he was unable to restore engine power and initiated a forced landing on an unlit road. During the landing flare, he realized that the road had turned, and he subsequently landed in a vineyard. The airplane struck multiple metal ground stakes, which resulted in substantial damage to both wing struts and horizontal stabilizers. The pilot added that for fuel planning purposes, he used his prior experience operating the accident airplane to estimate fuel consumption. Recorded ADS-B data for the initial flight spanned about 1 hour, 20 minutes, and started about 1.5 nm south of the departure airport and ended about 9.5 nm west of the destination airport. ADS-B data for the return flight spanned about 2 hours, 10 minutes, and began about 12 nm west of the departure airport and ended about 6 nm east of the accident site. According to the airplane’s cruise performance chart, at a cruise altitude of 7,500 ft and a power setting of 2,700 RPM, and a lean mixture, the airplane’s cruise endurance was approximately 4.1 hours. The chart also noted that the endurance and range calculations did not include allowances for takeoff or fuel reserve. Additionally, the cruise performance chart did not include fuel burn calculations for a climb from takeoff to a cruise altitude, which is however provided in the maximum rate of climb data chart. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed no evidence of any pre-accident mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. The fuel tanks or fuel lines were not breached. The left fuel tank contained about 4 ounces of fuel and the right fuel tank contained about 1/4 gallon of fuel.
The pilot’s inadequate preflight inspection and fuel planning, which resulted in a total loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion.
The pilot of the airplane reported that he was conducting a round-trip cross-country flight from his home airport to another airport. The pilot departed his home airport with full fuel tanks (26 gallons of fuel, of which 3.5 gallons were unusable) and he estimated it would have provided about 4.5 hours of flight time for the flight. Upon arrival at the destination airport, the pilot observed both fuel gauges at about 3/4 of a tank, he however, did not visually verify or measure the fuel levels in either tank. The pilot initially stated that his flight time on the outbound leg was approximately 2 hours, 10 minutes. However, he later reported that it was about 1.5 hours. He added that during the return portion of the flight at an altitude of about 8,500 ft mean sea level, the airplane encountered stronger-than-anticipated headwinds, that resulted in a reduced ground speed. He added that he also encountered up and down drafts, which resulted in him adding power and enriching the mixture to maintain altitude and airspeed. As the airplane approached the destination airport, the engine began to lose power and subsequently experienced a total loss of engine power. The pilot reported that he was unable to restore engine power and initiated a forced landing on an unlit road. During the landing flare, he realized that the road had turned, and he subsequently landed in a vineyard. The airplane struck multiple metal ground stakes, which resulted in substantial damage to both wing struts and horizontal stabilizers. The pilot added that for fuel planning purposes, he used his prior experience operating the accident airplane to estimate fuel consumption. Recorded ADS-B data for the initial flight spanned about 1 hour, 20 minutes, and started about 1.5 nm south of the departure airport and ended about 9.5 nm west of the destination airport. ADS-B data for the return flight spanned about 2 hours, 10 minutes, and began about 12 nm west of the departure airport and ended about 6 nm east of the accident site. According to the airplane’s cruise performance chart, at a cruise altitude of 7,500 ft and a power setting of 2,700 RPM, and a lean mixture, the airplane’s cruise endurance was approximately 4.1 hours. The chart also noted that the endurance and range calculations did not include allowances for takeoff or fuel reserve. Additionally, the cruise performance chart did not include fuel burn calculations for a climb from takeoff to a cruise altitude, which is however provided in the maximum rate of climb data chart. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed no evidence of any pre-accident mechanical malfunctions or failures that would have precluded normal operation. The fuel tanks or fuel lines were not breached. The left fuel tank contained about 4 ounces of fuel and the right fuel tank contained about 1/4 gallon of fuel.