Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

November 13, 2025 · Engineering & Research 415 C · N94342

Sheboygan Falls, WI

Overview

Report Status
Probable Cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
November 13, 2025
Injury Outcomes
No injuries (2 uninjured)
Location
Sheboygan Falls, WI
Aircraft
Engineering & Research 415 C (1946)
Tail Number
N94342
Injuries
None
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
NTSB Number
CEN26LA047

The flight instructor reported that during the night instructional flight, they had just completed a touch and go landing when he announced a simulated engine failure after takeoff to the student. Having only accomplished simulated engine failures after takeoff during the day, the student was slow to use the attitude directional indicator (ADI) to command the appropriate pitch attitude, and the airspeed began to decay. The flight instructor immediately took the flight controls and attempted to establish a proper pitch attitude and added power to climb. The airspeed did not build quickly enough so he applied full power to attempt to recover from the maneuver. He reported that the engine initially hesitated, and he pulled “almost full up elevator” to establish a level attitude as the engine began to develop full power. However, the airplane’s rate of descent was not arrested prior to runway contact resulting in a hard landing. The flight instructor reported that there were no mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation. The flight instructor reported that the accident could have been avoided if he had familiarized the student with the ADI’s visual reference for best rate of climb and a power off landing attitude prior to the night flight, as well as, how to use the ADI’s during night flights. Additionally, trees and terrain west of the airplane’s approach point might have disturbed the approach winds. The instructor planned to factor that in during future approaches.

NTSB Probable Cause

The flight instructor’s failure to arrest the airplane’s descent rate during a takeoff simulated engine failure which resulted in a hard landing.

Full Narrative

The flight instructor reported that during the night instructional flight, they had just completed a touch and go landing when he announced a simulated engine failure after takeoff to the student. Having only accomplished simulated engine failures after takeoff during the day, the student was slow to use the attitude directional indicator (ADI) to command the appropriate pitch attitude, and the airspeed began to decay. The flight instructor immediately took the flight controls and attempted to establish a proper pitch attitude and added power to climb. The airspeed did not build quickly enough so he applied full power to attempt to recover from the maneuver. He reported that the engine initially hesitated, and he pulled “almost full up elevator” to establish a level attitude as the engine began to develop full power. However, the airplane’s rate of descent was not arrested prior to runway contact resulting in a hard landing. The flight instructor reported that there were no mechanical malfunctions or failures with the airplane that would have precluded normal operation. The flight instructor reported that the accident could have been avoided if he had familiarized the student with the ADI’s visual reference for best rate of climb and a power off landing attitude prior to the night flight, as well as, how to use the ADI’s during night flights. Additionally, trees and terrain west of the airplane’s approach point might have disturbed the approach winds. The instructor planned to factor that in during future approaches.

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time20:35 CST
Nearest AirportSheboygan County Meml Intl (0nm SW)
Runway22
Runway Length6801 ft
Runway Width100 ft
Flight Plan FiledNone
Flight Plan ActivatedNo
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftEngineering & Research 415 C
Tail NumberN94342
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageSubstantial
Operating RulePart 91
Engines1
Engine TypeReciprocating
Engine DetailsContinental · C85-12F · Reciprocating · 85
Seats2

People & Injuries

Injury SummaryNo injuries (2 uninjured)
Fatal0
Serious0
Minor0
Uninjured2
Total2
Crew 1Age 21 · First Class · None
Crew 2Age 75 · Basc · None

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightNight
Wind280° @ 7 kt
Visibility10 sm
CeilingNone
Temperature / Dew Point41 F / 25 F
Altimeter29.95 inHg
Observation Time19:53
Weather SourceWFAC

Appendix: Source Data