Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

October 31, 2025 · Consolidated Vultee 28-5ACF · N222FT

Dayton, TN

Overview

Report Status
Probable Cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
October 31, 2025
Injury Outcomes
No injuries (3 uninjured)
Location
Dayton, TN
Aircraft
Consolidated Vultee 28-5ACF (1944)
Tail Number
N222FT
Operator
Pby
Injuries
None
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
NTSB Number
ERA26LA028

The airplane had been out of service for six months due to leaking hydraulic sequence valves. Following installation of the repaired components, maintenance personnel cycled the landing gear multiple times through its full range of travel. System pressure was maintained and no leaks were observed. The airplane was subsequently serviced with fuel, oil, and hydraulic fluid in preparation for a maintenance test flight. The pilot reported that a preflight inspection was completed, and the three crew members boarded the airplane for departure. The before takeoff checks, including a full power run-up of both engines, were completed with no anomalies noted. After takeoff and following the selection of the landing gear to the up position, at about 300 ft above ground level (agl), the flight engineer noticed they were losing hydraulic fluid from the right main landing gear. The left main and nose landing gear had fully retracted; however, the right main landing gear was partially retracted and not in its wheel well. The auxiliary hydraulic pump was selected on, followed by the selection of the landing gear to the down position. The left main gear subsequently indicated down and locked with the green gear position light illuminated; however, the nose gear was in the up position, and the right main landing gear was down but not locked. The flight crew climbed the airplane to about 1,500 ft agl and circled the airport, while the emergency landing gear extension procedure was performed. Following completion of the procedure, the three landing gear green position lights were illuminated indicating that the landing gear was down and locked, and the hydraulic system indicated no system pressure. The flight crew conducted a low pass over the airport while communicating with ground personnel who visually confirmed that three landing gear were in the down position. The airplane returned for landing, and the before landing checklist was completed. Upon touchdown, about 1,500 ft down the runway, the left main landing gear slowly retracted, and the airplane began to veer left. The pilot applied right brake and full right rudder in an attempt to correct for the veer, to no avail. The airplane departed the left side of the runway, the left wing struck a sign before impacting the ground, which resulted in substantial damage to the left wing and hull. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed that all three green landing gear position lights were illuminated; however, the left main landing gear had collapsed. Further examination revealed that the left main landing gear hydraulic actuator attachment bolt had sheared at the lower actuator attach point. In addition, the right wheel well was coated in hydraulic fluid, and the leak appeared to be from a hydraulic line that ran from the bottom of the actuator to the sequence valve. Examination of the failed landing gear bolt revealed reverse bending fatigue resulting from bending loads. The fractured surface exhibited a distinct overstress region with beach marks visible on both sides.

NTSB Probable Cause

The collapse of the left main landing gear due to the fatigue fracture of the lower landing gear actuator bolt.

Full Narrative

The airplane had been out of service for six months due to leaking hydraulic sequence valves. Following installation of the repaired components, maintenance personnel cycled the landing gear multiple times through its full range of travel. System pressure was maintained and no leaks were observed. The airplane was subsequently serviced with fuel, oil, and hydraulic fluid in preparation for a maintenance test flight. The pilot reported that a preflight inspection was completed, and the three crew members boarded the airplane for departure. The before takeoff checks, including a full power run-up of both engines, were completed with no anomalies noted. After takeoff and following the selection of the landing gear to the up position, at about 300 ft above ground level (agl), the flight engineer noticed they were losing hydraulic fluid from the right main landing gear. The left main and nose landing gear had fully retracted; however, the right main landing gear was partially retracted and not in its wheel well. The auxiliary hydraulic pump was selected on, followed by the selection of the landing gear to the down position. The left main gear subsequently indicated down and locked with the green gear position light illuminated; however, the nose gear was in the up position, and the right main landing gear was down but not locked. The flight crew climbed the airplane to about 1,500 ft agl and circled the airport, while the emergency landing gear extension procedure was performed. Following completion of the procedure, the three landing gear green position lights were illuminated indicating that the landing gear was down and locked, and the hydraulic system indicated no system pressure. The flight crew conducted a low pass over the airport while communicating with ground personnel who visually confirmed that three landing gear were in the down position. The airplane returned for landing, and the before landing checklist was completed. Upon touchdown, about 1,500 ft down the runway, the left main landing gear slowly retracted, and the airplane began to veer left. The pilot applied right brake and full right rudder in an attempt to correct for the veer, to no avail. The airplane departed the left side of the runway, the left wing struck a sign before impacting the ground, which resulted in substantial damage to the left wing and hull. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed that all three green landing gear position lights were illuminated; however, the left main landing gear had collapsed. Further examination revealed that the left main landing gear hydraulic actuator attachment bolt had sheared at the lower actuator attach point. In addition, the right wheel well was coated in hydraulic fluid, and the leak appeared to be from a hydraulic line that ran from the bottom of the actuator to the sequence valve. Examination of the failed landing gear bolt revealed reverse bending fatigue resulting from bending loads. The fractured surface exhibited a distinct overstress region with beach marks visible on both sides.

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time18:00 EDT
Nearest AirportMark Anton (0nm SSW)
Runway03
Runway Length5001 ft
Runway Width100 ft
Flight Plan FiledNone
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftConsolidated Vultee 28-5ACF
Tail NumberN222FT
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageSubstantial
OperatorPby
Operating RulePart 91
Engines2
Engine TypeReciprocating
Engine DetailsPratt & Whitney · R-1830-92 · Reciprocating · 1200 | Pratt & Whitney · R-1830-92 · Reciprocating · 1200
Seats12

People & Injuries

Injury SummaryNo injuries (3 uninjured)
Fatal0
Serious0
Minor0
Uninjured3
Total3
Crew 1Age 30 · First Class · None
Crew 2Age 66 · Second Class · None
Crew 3None

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDusk
Wind250° @ 11 kt
Visibility10 sm
CeilingNone
Temperature / Dew Point61 F / 39 F
Altimeter30.02 inHg
Observation Time13:53
Weather SourceWFAC

Appendix: Source Data