Overall Trends
Total, fatal, and serious accidents in the selected range.
Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.
Fast key and full-text search with live filters, watches, and precise metadata.
Use quotes for exact phrase matches (for example "fuel selector valve").
Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.
Major cases, deep-report coverage, and investigation media across decades of NTSB history.
Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.
NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.
The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.
The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.
Earlham, IA
The flight instructor reported that he and student departed about 1345 on a local flight to practice instrument approaches. About 1700, while returning to the destination airport and crossing the initial approach fix for a practice instrument approach, the left fuel tank indicator showed empty, and the right tank indicated about ¼ full (about 5 gallons remaining). About 6 miles from the runway, they felt a reduction in power, and the student announced the engine had lost power. The flight instructor took the controls and maneuvered the airplane to perform a forced landing to a field. They attempted to restart the engine, but the restart was not successful. During the forced landing, the airplane nosed over and came to rest inverted. The pilot estimated the total flight time was 3 hours and 15 minutes. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed substantial damage to empennage, and the fuel line to the fuel pump inlet did not contain any fuel. During recovery, a few ounces were found in the fuel system. The fuel tanks did not appear to be compromised, and fuel seepage from the wings was not detected on the ground. The flight instructor reported that throughout the flight, the student properly leaned the engine during cruise, and the fuel flow indicator showed about 6 gallons an hour average consumption during those times. The RPMs read about 2,100 to 2,200, and the indicated airspeed was just over 100 knots. The airplane’s fuel capacity was 40 gallons, and prior to departure, the airplane’s fuel tanks were full. The installed engine was derated to 185-horsepower. Engine performance charts showed that at 195-horsepower, fuel consumption could be approximately 15.8 gallons per hour. At 75% power (about 157-horsepower), fuel consumption was about 12.6 gallons per hour. However, precise flight information was not available to confirm total fuel consumption for the accident flight.
The flight instructor’s inadequate fuel management which resulted in the total loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion.
The flight instructor reported that he and student departed about 1345 on a local flight to practice instrument approaches. About 1700, while returning to the destination airport and crossing the initial approach fix for a practice instrument approach, the left fuel tank indicator showed empty, and the right tank indicated about ¼ full (about 5 gallons remaining). About 6 miles from the runway, they felt a reduction in power, and the student announced the engine had lost power. The flight instructor took the controls and maneuvered the airplane to perform a forced landing to a field. They attempted to restart the engine, but the restart was not successful. During the forced landing, the airplane nosed over and came to rest inverted. The pilot estimated the total flight time was 3 hours and 15 minutes. Postaccident examination of the airplane revealed substantial damage to empennage, and the fuel line to the fuel pump inlet did not contain any fuel. During recovery, a few ounces were found in the fuel system. The fuel tanks did not appear to be compromised, and fuel seepage from the wings was not detected on the ground. The flight instructor reported that throughout the flight, the student properly leaned the engine during cruise, and the fuel flow indicator showed about 6 gallons an hour average consumption during those times. The RPMs read about 2,100 to 2,200, and the indicated airspeed was just over 100 knots. The airplane’s fuel capacity was 40 gallons, and prior to departure, the airplane’s fuel tanks were full. The installed engine was derated to 185-horsepower. Engine performance charts showed that at 195-horsepower, fuel consumption could be approximately 15.8 gallons per hour. At 75% power (about 157-horsepower), fuel consumption was about 12.6 gallons per hour. However, precise flight information was not available to confirm total fuel consumption for the accident flight.