Premium research interface

The modern interface for aviation safety intelligence.

Search investigations, review source evidence, monitor watched reports, and trace long-term patterns from one calm, data-first workspace.

63k+
Reports indexed
1940-2026
Coverage
Recent
Last data refresh
Featured Report

Loading…

Loading featured report…

Loading…
Open Report

Safety trends by operating rule

Track fatal and non-fatal accident patterns across Part 91, Part 135, and Part 121 operations.

Loading trend charts…

Browse the aviation graph

Move quickly by aircraft, airport, operator, and time with indexes built for research, not wandering.

Last Data Update

By Decade

By Month

Aircraft Manufacturer

More manufacturers

Airports

More airports

Operators

More operators

About

Aviation safety reports, made easier to study

NTSB Reports is an independent research and search tool for public aviation accident and incident records. It brings NTSB aviation reports, structured fields, docket files, extracted figures, photos, videos, and update history into one searchable interface.

The goal is practical safety education: make it faster to find relevant investigations, compare similar events, review factual records, and understand the evidence behind probable-cause and preliminary reports.

The investigative work and source records belong to the National Transportation Safety Board and the published investigation record. This site is not affiliated with or endorsed by the NTSB.

FAQs

NTSB Report

August 26, 2025 · Beech C35 · N655D

Lakeview, TX

Overview

Report Status
Probable Cause
Event Type
Accident
Date
August 26, 2025
Injury Outcomes
2 injuries (2 minor injuries)
Location
Lakeview, TX
Aircraft
Beech C35 (1951)
Tail Number
N655D
Injuries
Minor
Aircraft Damage
Substantial
NTSB Number
CEN25LA347

The pilot reported the engine start, run-up, and takeoff were routine. About 35 minutes after takeoff, the pilot changed from the right to the left fuel tank. About 2 hours after taking off while in cruise flight at 6,500 ft mean sea level, the engine sputtered accompanied by a reduction in the fuel flow. The pilot activated the fuel boost pump with no effect on the fuel flow. He subsequently changed from the left fuel tank to the right fuel tank again with no effect and then returned the fuel selector to the left fuel tank. The propeller continued to windmill and further troubleshooting did not restore engine power so the pilot executed a forced landing to an open field populated with vegetation and sparse brush. The airframe sustained substantial damage to both wings and the fuselage. ADS-B data revealed the airplane departed at 1647:43 and ultimately climbed to a cruise altitude of about 6,500 ft msl. About 1853, the airplane entered a gradual descent which continued until the final data point consistent with a loss of engine power about that time. The final ADS-B data point was recorded at 1857:31. The altitude associated with that final data point was about 2,475 ft msl, which was about 50 ft above ground level. A postaccident examination did not reveal any evidence of a fuel leak or vegetation blight. The fuel caps were securely installed, and the fuel system appeared to be intact. About 8 gallons of fuel were recovered from the left tank and 3 gallons were recovered from the auxiliary tank. The right fuel tank was empty. The FAA inspector observed the fuel selector set to the left fuel tank when on scene after the accident. Postrecovery airframe fuel system and engine examinations did not reveal any anomalies consistent with a loss of engine power. According to the Pilot Operating Handbook, the engine was expected to burn about 9.7 gallons per hour (gph) and 11.2 gph at 65% and 75% engine power, respectively. The unusable fuel was 3 gallons in each main tank. The pilot stated that about 33 gallons of fuel were onboard at takeoff. Since about 11 gallons remained in the airplane at the time of the accident, the engine had burned about 22 gallons which was consistent with the flight time of 2 hours and 5 minutes from takeoff until the loss of engine power. In light of the lack of anomalies with respect to the engine and the fuel system, it is likely the pilot inadvertently ran the right fuel tank dry and was not able to reestablish fuel flow to the engine from the left fuel tank.

NTSB Probable Cause

The pilot’s fuel system mismanagement which resulted in a loss of engine power due to fuel starvation.

Full Narrative

The pilot reported the engine start, run-up, and takeoff were routine. About 35 minutes after takeoff, the pilot changed from the right to the left fuel tank. About 2 hours after taking off while in cruise flight at 6,500 ft mean sea level, the engine sputtered accompanied by a reduction in the fuel flow. The pilot activated the fuel boost pump with no effect on the fuel flow. He subsequently changed from the left fuel tank to the right fuel tank again with no effect and then returned the fuel selector to the left fuel tank. The propeller continued to windmill and further trouble shooting did not restore engine power so the pilot executed a forced landing to an open field populated with vegetation and sparse brush. The airframe sustained substantial damage to both wings and the fuselage. ADS-B data revealed the airplane departed at 1647:43 and ultimately climbed to a cruise altitude of about 6,500 ft msl. About 1853, the airplane entered a gradual descent which continued until the final data point consistent with a loss of engine power about that time. The final ADS-B data point was recorded at 1857:31. The altitude associated with that final data point was about 2,475 ft msl, which was about 50 ft above ground level. A postaccident examination did not reveal any evidence of a fuel leak or vegetation blight. The fuel caps were securely installed, and the fuel system appeared to be intact. About 8 gallons of fuel were recovered from the left tank and 3 gallons were recovered from the auxiliary tank. The right fuel tank was empty. The FAA inspector observed the fuel selector set to the left fuel tank when on scene after the accident. Postrecovery airframe fuel system and engine examinations did not reveal any anomalies consistent with a loss of engine power. According to the Pilot Operating Handbook, the engine was expected to burn about 9.7 gallons per hour (gph) and 11.2 gph at 65% and 75% engine power, respectively. The unusable fuel was 3 gallons in each main tank. The pilot stated that about 33 gallons of fuel were onboard at takeoff. Since about 11 gallons remained in the airplane at the time of the accident, the engine had burned about 22 gallons which was consistent with the flight time of 2 hours and 5 minutes from takeoff until the loss of engine power. In light of the lack of anomalies with respect to the engine and the fuel system, it is likely the pilot inadvertently ran the right fuel tank dry and was not able to reestablish fuel flow to the engine from the left fuel tank.

Flight

Event TypeAccident
Event Time18:57 CDT
Nearest AirportN/A (0nm)
RunwayN/A
Runway Length0
Runway Width0
Flight Plan FiledNone
Flight Plan ActivatedNo
Aircraft FireNo
Aircraft ExplosionNo

Aircraft

AircraftBeech C35
Tail NumberN655D
Aircraft CategoryAir
DamageSubstantial
Operating RulePart 91
Engines1
Engine TypeReciprocating
Engine DetailsCont Motor · E185 · Reciprocating · 205
Seats4

People & Injuries

Injury Summary2 injuries (2 minor injuries)
Fatal0
Serious0
Minor2
Uninjured0
Total2
Crew 1Age 70 · First Class · Minor

Conditions

ConditionsVMC
LightDaylight
Wind60° @ 5 kt
Visibility10 sm
CeilingOvercast 1500 ft
Temperature / Dew Point70 F / 63 F
Altimeter30.19 inHg
Observation Time18:53
Weather SourceWFAC

Appendix: Source Data